Trump Administration Asks OpenAI to Stagger Release of New Model Over Security Concerns Save 25% to unlock this story

Sign in
Subscribe

    Data Tools

    • About Pro
    • The Executives Leading the Data Center Race
    • The Next GPs 2026
    • The Next GPs 2025
    • The Rising Stars of AI Research
    • Leaders of the AI Shopping Revolution
    • Enterprise Software Startup Takeover List
    • Org Charts
    • The Information 50 2025
    • Generative AI Takeover List
    • Generative AI Database
    • AI Chip Database
    • AI Data Center Database
    • Tech IPO Tracker
    • Tech Sentiment Tracker
    • Gigafactory Database

    Special Projects

    • The Information 50 Database
    • VC Diversity Index
    • Enterprise Tech Powerlist
  • Org Charts
  • Deep Research
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Weekend
  • Charts
  • Events
  • TITV
    • Directory

      Search, find and engage with others who are serious about tech and business.

    • Forum

      Follow and be a part of discussions about tech, finance and media.

    • Brand Partnerships

      Premium advertising opportunities for brands

    • Group Subscriptions

      Team access to our exclusive tech news

    • Newsletters

      Journalists who break and shape the news, in your inbox

    • Video

      Catch up on conversations with global leaders in tech, media and finance

    • Partner Content

      Explore our recent partner collaborations

      XFacebookLinkedInThreadsInstagram
    • Help & Support
    • RSS Feed
    • Careers
    Sign in
  • About Pro
  • The Executives Leading the Data Center Race
  • The Next GPs 2026
  • The Next GPs 2025
  • The Rising Stars of AI Research
  • Leaders of the AI Shopping Revolution
  • Enterprise Software Startup Takeover List
  • Org Charts
  • The Information 50 2025
  • Generative AI Takeover List
  • Generative AI Database
  • AI Chip Database
  • AI Data Center Database
  • Tech IPO Tracker
  • Tech Sentiment Tracker
  • Gigafactory Database

SPECIAL PROJECTS

  • The Information 50 Database
  • VC Diversity Index
  • Enterprise Tech Powerlist
Deep Research
TITV
Tech
Finance
Weekend
Charts
Events
Newsletters
  • Directory

    Search, find and engage with others who are serious about tech and business.

  • Forum

    Follow and be a part of discussions about tech, finance and media.

  • Brand Partnerships

    Premium advertising opportunities for brands

  • Group Subscriptions

    Team access to our exclusive tech news

  • Newsletters

    Journalists who break and shape the news, in your inbox

  • Video

    Catch up on conversations with global leaders in tech, media and finance

  • Partner Content

    Explore our recent partner collaborations

Subscribe
  • Sign in
  • Search
  • Opinion
  • Venture Capital
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Startups
  • Market Research
    XFacebookLinkedInThreadsInstagram
  • Help & Support
  • RSS Feed
  • Careers

Leading AIAI that means business

Learn more
Featured Partner
Google Cloud logo
Applied AI

AWS Took its Time Disclosing Security Flaw in AI Coding Tool

Photo by Getty
By
Kevin McLaughlin
[email protected]Profile and archive

While artificial intelligence-powered coding is jet fuel for developer productivity, a string of incidents in recent months shows why customers should tread carefully in this version of the Wild West. 

In the latest worrisome development, a hacker recently found a way to upload malicious code to an Amazon Web Services’ AI coding assistant, Q Developer, that ordered the software to delete data from customers’ computers.

AWS says it has fixed the glitch, which affected a software extension that lets Q Developer work with a popular open source developer service called Visual Studio Code, and that no customers lost their data. According to 404 Media, which first reported the incident, the hacker wasn’t looking to cause havoc but wanted to see if Amazon would own up to the security issue. 

If that’s the case, AWS failed the test.

AWS didn’t issue a public advisory notifying customers of the problem until Wednesday evening Pacific time. Such an advisory is standard practice in the software industry. An earlier advisory would have given customers a chance to immediately scan their computers for signs of trouble. And AWS spokespeople have yet to explain on the record why it chose not to do so. 

The lack of communication is arguably a bigger misstep than the malicious code, said a former AWS manager.

This isn’t the first time AI coding products have faced security issues. Lovable and Replit each have experienced problems of late, as we covered here and here.

Recommended