Trump Administration Asks OpenAI to Stagger Release of New Model Over Security Concerns Save 25% to unlock this story

Sign in
Subscribe

    Data Tools

    • About Pro
    • The Executives Leading the Data Center Race
    • The Next GPs 2026
    • The Next GPs 2025
    • The Rising Stars of AI Research
    • Leaders of the AI Shopping Revolution
    • Enterprise Software Startup Takeover List
    • Org Charts
    • The Information 50 2025
    • Generative AI Takeover List
    • Generative AI Database
    • AI Chip Database
    • AI Data Center Database
    • Tech IPO Tracker
    • Tech Sentiment Tracker
    • Gigafactory Database

    Special Projects

    • The Information 50 Database
    • VC Diversity Index
    • Enterprise Tech Powerlist
  • Org Charts
  • Deep Research
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Weekend
  • Charts
  • Events
  • TITV
    • Directory

      Search, find and engage with others who are serious about tech and business.

    • Forum

      Follow and be a part of discussions about tech, finance and media.

    • Brand Partnerships

      Premium advertising opportunities for brands

    • Group Subscriptions

      Team access to our exclusive tech news

    • Newsletters

      Journalists who break and shape the news, in your inbox

    • Video

      Catch up on conversations with global leaders in tech, media and finance

    • Partner Content

      Explore our recent partner collaborations

      XFacebookLinkedInThreadsInstagram
    • Help & Support
    • RSS Feed
    • Careers
    Sign in
  • About Pro
  • The Executives Leading the Data Center Race
  • The Next GPs 2026
  • The Next GPs 2025
  • The Rising Stars of AI Research
  • Leaders of the AI Shopping Revolution
  • Enterprise Software Startup Takeover List
  • Org Charts
  • The Information 50 2025
  • Generative AI Takeover List
  • Generative AI Database
  • AI Chip Database
  • AI Data Center Database
  • Tech IPO Tracker
  • Tech Sentiment Tracker
  • Gigafactory Database

SPECIAL PROJECTS

  • The Information 50 Database
  • VC Diversity Index
  • Enterprise Tech Powerlist
Deep Research
TITV
Tech
Finance
Weekend
Charts
Events
Newsletters
  • Directory

    Search, find and engage with others who are serious about tech and business.

  • Forum

    Follow and be a part of discussions about tech, finance and media.

  • Brand Partnerships

    Premium advertising opportunities for brands

  • Group Subscriptions

    Team access to our exclusive tech news

  • Newsletters

    Journalists who break and shape the news, in your inbox

  • Video

    Catch up on conversations with global leaders in tech, media and finance

  • Partner Content

    Explore our recent partner collaborations

Subscribe
  • Sign in
  • Search
  • Opinion
  • Venture Capital
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Startups
  • Market Research
    XFacebookLinkedInThreadsInstagram
  • Help & Support
  • RSS Feed
  • Careers

In-depth insights in seconds. Ask Deep Research.

The Briefing

Why Nelson Peltz Can’t Fix Disney

Nelson Peltz. Photo by Getty
By
Martin Peers
[email protected]Profile and archive

Judging by two news events this week, next year will be dominated by new episodes in that long-running series, “The Decline of the TV Industry.” First, widespread reports that Shari Redstone is in talks to sell her stake in CBS owner Paramount Global suggest the Redstone family is finally throwing in the towel. Or at least they’re trying to, if they can find someone to catch it. And second, Nelson Peltz stepped up his pressure on Disney by nominating himself and former Disney Chief Financial Officer Jay Rasulo (the latter playing the role of Brutus to Disney CEO Bob Iger’s Caesar) for election to Disney’s board. At the heart of both dramas is shareholder dissatisfaction with the sorry state of the TV industry. Shareholder activism can’t solve that problem, and selling only kicks the issue to someone else.

The core issue is that we’re transitioning from the cable TV business model, which was skewed to making unreasonable profits at the expense of viewers, to a streaming one that gives consumers more control. Even as streaming services introduce ads and ratchet up prices to cut their losses, we can still easily chop and change streamers we’re paying for, which isn’t true with cable. (I recently discovered I was paying, via Amazon Channels, for five services I’d stopped watching. It took a minute to cancel four of them.) And, given the competition from Netflix, Amazon and Apple, this consumer-friendly approach is likely to persist. What that means is the TV industry’s fat profit margins of years past are not coming back.

Recommended