Exclusive: Mercor’s Fast Growth Relies on Biggest AI Companies, Documents Show Save 25% to unlock this story

Sign in
Subscribe

    Data Tools

    • About Pro
    • Enterprise Software Startup Takeover List 2026
    • The Next GPs 2026
    • The Executives Leading the Data Center Race
    • The Next GPs 2025
    • The Rising Stars of AI Research
    • Leaders of the AI Shopping Revolution
    • Enterprise Software Startup Takeover List 2025
    • Org Charts
    • The Information 50 2025
    • Generative AI Takeover List
    • Generative AI Database
    • AI Chip Database
    • AI Data Center Database
    • Tech IPO Tracker
    • Tech Sentiment Tracker
    • Gigafactory Database

    Special Projects

    • The Information 50 Database
    • VC Diversity Index
    • Enterprise Tech Powerlist
  • Org Charts
  • Deep Research
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Weekend
  • Charts
  • Events
  • TITV
    • Directory

      Search, find and engage with others who are serious about tech and business.

    • Forum

      Follow and be a part of discussions about tech, finance and media.

    • Brand Partnerships

      Premium advertising opportunities for brands

    • Group Subscriptions

      Team access to our exclusive tech news

    • Newsletters

      Journalists who break and shape the news, in your inbox

    • Video

      Catch up on conversations with global leaders in tech, media and finance

    • Partner Content

      Explore our recent partner collaborations

      XFacebookLinkedInThreadsInstagram
    • Help & Support
    • RSS Feed
    • Careers
    Sign in
  • About Pro
  • Enterprise Software Startup Takeover List 2026
  • The Next GPs 2026
  • The Executives Leading the Data Center Race
  • The Next GPs 2025
  • The Rising Stars of AI Research
  • Leaders of the AI Shopping Revolution
  • Enterprise Software Startup Takeover List 2025
  • Org Charts
  • The Information 50 2025
  • Generative AI Takeover List
  • Generative AI Database
  • AI Chip Database
  • AI Data Center Database
  • Tech IPO Tracker
  • Tech Sentiment Tracker
  • Gigafactory Database

SPECIAL PROJECTS

  • The Information 50 Database
  • VC Diversity Index
  • Enterprise Tech Powerlist
Deep Research
TITV
Tech
Finance
Weekend
Charts
Events
Newsletters
  • Directory

    Search, find and engage with others who are serious about tech and business.

  • Forum

    Follow and be a part of discussions about tech, finance and media.

  • Brand Partnerships

    Premium advertising opportunities for brands

  • Group Subscriptions

    Team access to our exclusive tech news

  • Newsletters

    Journalists who break and shape the news, in your inbox

  • Video

    Catch up on conversations with global leaders in tech, media and finance

  • Partner Content

    Explore our recent partner collaborations

Subscribe
  • Sign in
  • Search
  • Opinion
  • Venture Capital
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Startups
  • Market Research
    XFacebookLinkedInThreadsInstagram
  • Help & Support
  • RSS Feed
  • Careers

Scale confidently.Scale confidently.

Learn more
Featured Partner
PwC logo
AI Agenda

When Does ‘Fake It Till You Make It’ Just Become ‘Faking It’?; The History of ‘Plagiarism’ in AI

Pay no mind to the man behind the curtain. Photo via YouTube/Warner Bros. Entertainment.
By
Stephanie Palazzolo
[email protected]Profile and archive

Fame can be a double-edged sword—a lesson some artificial intelligence startups are learning the hard way.

Take Devin, the AI-powered coding assistant developed by Cognition AI that went viral when it launched last month with an impressive demo showing how it could complete coding jobs on the freelance site Upwork. Techies across X and Reddit declared that software engineering as a career was dead.

Over the weekend, though, a YouTube video titled, “Debunking Devin: ‘First AI Software Engineer’ Upwork lie exposed!” began picking up steam. In the video, a developer describes some inconsistencies in Devin’s demo, including the fact that Devin doesn’t actually do what the Upwork posting is asking for; that the bugs it’s fixing were likely created by the coding assistant itself; and that it seems to take six-plus hours to complete a task that should have taken half an hour.

Recommended